Last updated: June 2026
FileMaker is alive and supported by Claris, an Apple company, in 20261. Businesses rarely leave because it stopped working. They leave because the annual per-user license keeps climbing with headcount, the apps stop running the moment a renewal lapses2, and the lock-in blocks integrations the business now needs.
A finance and IT team reviewing annual FileMaker subscription costs during a 2026 software migration decision

Is FileMaker dead, or still supported in 2026?

It is not dead, and that distinction matters before any cost conversation. Claris, an Apple subsidiary, shipped FileMaker 2025 (version 22.0.4) in November 20251, and the 2025 release added built-in AI features3. The abandonware story that applies to Visual FoxPro or Paradox does not apply here.

Support still ends version by version. FileMaker 19.6 reached end of product support on December 19, 20244, which means staying put on an old release is its own risk. The product is moving toward AI features and renewed licensing, not toward lower cost. So the real question is not whether FileMaker is supported. It is whether paying for it every year is still the right financial call for this particular business.

How does the per-user subscription work, and why does the cost climb with the team?

FileMaker is licensed as an annual subscription, priced per user, with named-user and concurrent-user options5. Claris states that pricing varies by the number of users6. Every person who touches the app is a billable seat, so a 30-person operation pays for roughly 30 users every year, with no perpetual-license off-ramp.

Hosting adds a second layer. You run on FileMaker Server, which you host yourself, or on FileMaker Cloud, and certain cloud tiers cap storage and compute with no upgrade path on that tier6. The bill grows in two directions at once: more people using the app, and more infrastructure as the data accumulates. Neither curve bends downward over time.

What happens to your apps if you stop paying?

This is the part buyers tend to underestimate. The annual user license is not perpetual. Under Claris license terms, the software ceases to work if the subscription is not renewed2.

There is no fallback to a paid-up older copy that quietly keeps running. Stop the renewal, and the custom apps the business depends on go dark. That is a sharper risk than a perpetual license that merely stops receiving updates, because here the lights actually turn off.

A perpetual license that stops updating is a security problem you can schedule. A subscription that switches the application off when payment lapses is a business-continuity problem with no grace period.

What is FileMaker lock-in beyond the price?

Price is the visible cost. Lock-in is the one that decides how hard leaving will be later. It shows up in three places.

Proprietary format

FileMaker stores data in its own format, not a standard SQL database. Moving the data out is an export and remap, not a copy.

Version treadmill

Client and server versions are coupled. FileMaker Cloud 2025 requires FileMaker Pro 2023 or newer, and older clients cannot connect after the update8.

Platform gravity

Business logic lives inside FileMaker scripts and layouts. The longer the app grows, the larger the eventual rebuild when you leave.

Upgrading the host can force every workstation to upgrade with it. That coupling is convenient while you stay, and it is exactly what makes a half-measure exit hard once the app has years of logic inside it. The data is recoverable. The decade of accumulated rules is the part that takes work to move, which is where PCG's conversion, migration, and integration work starts.

When does it make sense to migrate instead of renewing another year?

Renewing is the right move when FileMaker still fits the work and the annual cost stays proportionate to the value it returns. Migration earns its place when one or more of these is true:

  • The per-user bill has grown past what the app gives back.
  • The business needs integrations, such as accounting, a customer web portal, or an external API, that FileMaker makes awkward or expensive.
  • The app has outgrown FileMaker's performance envelope under real concurrent load.
  • A single developer built it, that person is gone, and every renewal deepens dependence on a system nobody on staff can fully explain.

That last point is the one PCG sees most often. When the builder has moved on, the right first step is reading the app rather than interviewing people who no longer remember it. Here is what to do when your original developer disappears.

Not sure whether to renew or migrate?

A 20-minute call. PCG asks about your app, your user count, and your renewal date, then tells you which way the math points.

Book Your Free Consultation

What do you gain, and what do you give up, by leaving FileMaker?

The decision is rarely about whether FileMaker can do the job. It is about who controls the cost and the data over the next several years.

Stay on FileMaker

Best when the app is small, stable, and proportionate
  • Fast in-app changes through FileMaker's own tools
  • No migration project to fund this year
  • Familiar to the people who already use it
  • Cost is the recurring per-user renewal, which grows with the team

Migrate off FileMaker

Best when cost, integration, or load have tipped
  • You own the stack, on a standard SQL database
  • No per-seat renewal that can switch the app off
  • Freedom to integrate with the rest of the business
  • Cost is a one-time migration project with a fixed scope

31 years of running custom software projects points to one pattern. The renewal invoice arrives every year whether or not the app still earns it, and the business that waits for a price increase or a failed integration to force the decision ends up migrating on emergency timing instead of planned timing. The cost of waiting is not the subscription. It is the loss of the choice about when to move.

Run the numbers on your FileMaker app

PCG runs a fixed-fee discovery that reads your app and quotes a migration path off real numbers, not a guess.

Book Your Free Consultation

Frequently Asked Questions

Is FileMaker discontinued in 2026?+
No. Claris, an Apple company, released FileMaker 2025 (version 22.0.4) in November 2025, and it is actively sold and supported. Support still ends version by version, so older releases such as FileMaker 19.6 reached end of product support on December 19, 2024.
Does FileMaker stop working if I cancel the subscription?+
Yes. The annual user license is not perpetual. Claris license terms state the software ceases to function if the subscription is not renewed, so the custom apps built on FileMaker stop running when payment lapses.
How is FileMaker priced?+
As an annual subscription billed per user, with named-user and concurrent-user options. Claris states the price varies by number of users, and hosting through FileMaker Server or FileMaker Cloud is a separate cost.
Can I keep an old version of FileMaker to avoid paying?+
Not as a durable plan. Client and server versions are coupled, and older clients are blocked from connecting after a host upgrade. Running an unsupported version also means no security updates.
Is it hard to migrate off FileMaker?+
It is a project, not a copy. FileMaker uses a proprietary format, so the data and the business logic have to be exported and rebuilt on the target. The size of the job depends on how much logic lives inside the app.
Is staying on FileMaker cheaper than building a custom app?+
It depends on user count and how long the app will run. A small, stable app can be cheaper to keep. A growing per-seat bill over many years often passes the one-time cost of a custom build.
Who migrates a business off FileMaker?+
A custom software firm that does legacy migration. PCG has run migrations off Microsoft Access, Visual FoxPro, Paradox, and VB6 since the late 1990s, starting each engagement with a discovery phase that inventories what the app actually does.
About the Author

Allison Woolbert

CEO and Senior Systems Architect, Phoenix Consultants Group

Allison Woolbert is the principal of Phoenix Consultants Group, the custom software consultancy founded in 1995. PCG has run legacy migration projects across Microsoft Access, FileMaker, Visual FoxPro, Paradox, and VB6 for industrial, manufacturing, and environmental services clients since the late 1990s.

Allison leads PCG's discovery and architecture practice, where the first deliverable on every legacy engagement is an honest inventory of what the existing application does and what it should do next. LinkedIn.

1 Claris International / Apple; Wikipedia. FileMaker is developed by Claris International, an Apple company. FileMaker 2025 (version 22.0.4) released November 2025. claris.com/filemaker; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FileMaker

2 Claris license terms, documented via University of Iowa ITS software catalog. Annual user license; the software ceases working if the license is not renewed. its.uiowa.edu

3 Claris. Announcing the 2025 release of Claris FileMaker, July 8, 2025, including built-in AI capabilities. claris.com/blog

4 Claris. Download and support page noting FileMaker 19.6 product support ended December 19, 2024. claris.com/resources/downloads

5 Claris pricing; University of Iowa ITS. Named-user and concurrent-user license models. claris.com/pricing; its.uiowa.edu

6 Claris pricing. Price varies by number of users; FileMaker Cloud tiers list fixed storage and compute with no upgrade path on that tier. claris.com/pricing

8 Claris. FileMaker Cloud 2025 requires FileMaker Pro 2023 or newer; older clients cannot connect after the release. claris.com/blog

This article is informational and not legal, financial, or compliance advice for a specific situation. Phoenix Consultants Group has provided custom software development since 1995.